MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Dang SAG It!

I feel like I’ve been saying the same thing every day this week and for the last few… this season is a puzzle that will not be solved until The Academy membership votes and makes their 5 and or 6 – 10 choices in each category. Didn’t get BFCA… you can get SAG. Got SAG… might not get Globes. Got Globes and SAG… still unsure about Oscar.

The most obviously treacherous place is Best Actress, with 8 clear serious candidates. But both supporting categories offer a similar number of candidates floating out there, though the argument for one over another may not be as compelling or passionate in every case. This morning, Jonah Hill supporters got what they’ve wanted… and Albert Brooks supporters are wondering what SAG’s problem with Drive is. Well… neither feeling is necessarily supported by reality. Brooks may well have paid a price for Mr. Gosling’s unavailability. Or maybe that group just didn’t like Drive as much as something else. Or maybe they saw it as a movie with a Canadian star, a British female lead, and a great writer who acts. Perhaps if Albert wore make-up that made him look like a burn victim he could have been nominated. (I really like Armie Hammer… but really?)

Bridesmaids is the clarifying SAG nomination – in Ensemble – for me. I certainly can’t begrudge the ensemble nomination for the film. It’s a wide ranging crew of very funny women (and even a few men) and though Ms Wiig gets a lot of screen time, it’s really an ensemble piece. Moreover, it is loaded with TV talent that fits right in with the actors. Now… how do you compare Bridesmaids with the work with the ensemble of Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, a movie that suffers in award season heavily from being such and ensemble piece? Comedy has an unfair bias against it in award season. So, yay for the comedy. But really?

Wait… can’t forget about SAG’s clear annual bias against foreign actors! They break their own unspoken rule at times. But when things are all relatively even, forget about them foreigners. War Horse is another big ensemble film that was late in being sprung… but is truly an ensemble… and a remarkable one. But also loaded with foreigners and foreigners who didn’t come to LA and do a lot of Q&A time. SAG isn’t star-f***ing like HFPA… but a nominating committee likes to get courted, at least a little.

God bless Bridesmaids… but it fit better in many ways. And as a result, has a SAG ensemble nomination. Unlike HFPA, this is not about SAG members wanting a good show. The votes are, I feel, in earnest. But if you think Bridesmaids is getting an Oscar Best Picture nomination because of this… you would be nuts. (Melissa McCarthy’s candidacy for a Supporting Actress nod, is now looking very strong.)

Anyway…

Today, it’s SAG. Tomorrow, it’s HFPA. Expect a whole different kind of shading there, though some will be tempted to just on the Bridesmaids BP bandwagon after it gets a Comedy/Musical nod from The Globes. Silly.

And what of Hugo, which seemed to be surging as of late? It’s fine.

And what of Michael Fassbender? Fine.

Etc, etc, etc…

You know what you NEED to get an Oscar nomination? Votes by Academy members. And this year, though I think we can narrow our notion of what the field is… but I don’t think there is a single category amongst the actors and Picture where you can really be sure we know who is in more than 60% of the slots at this point.

Or as 1957 Oscar winner Yul Brynner might say, “It’s a puzzlement.”

Be Sociable, Share!

37 Responses to “Dang SAG It!”

  1. LexG says:

    No Woodley?!?!?!?!

    Not pleased.

  2. Don R. Lewis says:

    Maybe all this schizophrenic voting from all these groups will finally put an END to “Awards Season” and allow films to come out throughout the year instead of in a political glut in the fall and winter. I hope so, but doubt it.

    And I don’t think TINKER TAILOR… is as solid an ensemble as BRIDESMAIDS because the characters in the latter are literally (and figuratively) chess pieces for Oldman’s Smiley to move around. The exist as plot pieces and not characters.

  3. David says:

    Well, did FilmDistrict even mount a serious campaign for Drive before the critics awards in early Dec.? There is like one print ads and I have never even seen an internet ad for any oscar blogs, while flash ads by Fox Searching, TWC and Sony constantly crash my browser.

    It’s funny because Drive feels exactly like a European film. I think you kind of have a point, the director is Scandinavia and the two main stars are Canadian and British. It is easy to blame the studio or Gosling for not taking part of an long and exhausting campaign. But if the movie itself were not made for the awards season, it’s a big risk spend two or three months of everyone’s time and a whole not of money to do something that may or may not pay off. I don’t think the scale of the studio allows for a serious campaign. With that said, I am so happy that Brooks and Drive doing fairly well with the critics.

  4. LexG says:

    TINKER TAILOR: I think Oldman, Firth, Cumberbatch, Strong and Hardy certainly have their little moments to shine, but it’s not like they’re gnawing on carcasses sweating and bleeding giving a Michael Shannon-level intense performance…

    Then you got a great actor like Cirian Hinds there, and he does literally NOTHING the entire movie except hum a ditty to frighten Cumberbatch… Hurt’s always solid and Toby Jones blusters a little, but compared to a movie like MARGIN CALL, where like a half-dozen guys and Demi each get these AWESOME extended moments and monologues? TTSS is like a HEAT-type movie where everyone in a big cast has their little moments, but it’s a sprawling procedural deal first and foremost.

  5. LexG says:

    Oh, and NO THERON, but a bunch of TIRED OLD BAGS who get nominated EVERY SINGLE TIME? UGH, other than Michelle Williams and Berenenenenenenrenicce Bejo, this is like the No Hotness Awards.

  6. Daniella Isaacs says:

    “Tired old bags” who always get nominated? Swinton and Davis have both been nominated once each for Oscars thus far and Swinton is 51 and Davis is 46. I wonder how energetic–and good looking–most of the trolls on this site will be when they’re past 40. These are some of the most vibrant and attractive women on the planet. Sheeesh. Ageist twit.

  7. LexG says:

    “These are some of the most vibrant and attractive women on the planet. Sheeesh”

    Oh, come on, don’t do that thing where WOMEN ROOT FOR WOMEN and have to go to the mat for old broads; I don’t get on the internet and champion Burt Young if some chick on a blog says he isn’t sexy.

    Some of the REAL most beautiful women gave great performances this year: Theron, Woodley, Elizabeth Olsen, Kirsten Dunst, Chloe Grace Moretz. All snubbed, all because of these DINOSAURS from 30 years ago who get insta-nominated on name value alone by a voting body (SAG) that’s just a bunch of bitter hack actors with no vision or creativity, most of whom probably don’t even SEE the movies. How many SAG members have had a chance to see THE IRON LADY this early? That’s a knee-jerk vote for the name STREEP, instead of honoring the BEST PERFORMANCE OF THE YEAR, Charlize Theron.

  8. Paul D/Stella says:

    I am thrilled to see that Swinton keeps getting recognized for her remarkable performance in Kevin. I expected her to be overlooked. I am psyched to see Young Adult though. Looks like Theron does award-worthy work in it. And she is hot.

  9. storymark says:

    Women over 40 aren’t “real” but a child is….

    And he wonders why he skeeves out so many.

  10. LexG says:

    Oh, come on, I’m not gonna DIGNIFY that garbage. Plus my #1 pick is Charlize Theron, who is super sexy AND is my age almost exactly. Charlize is the greatest thing EVER in Young Adult, and wasn’t nominated, but a fat woman taking a dump in a PIE was.

    I’m talking about acting, and how SAG has prejudices, and probably doesn’t even see the movies, and doesn’t know the new faces or names, because who in SAG goes to the screenings? Broke-ass extras and unemployed bitter older actors who have lots of free time. Their choices are an EMBARRASSMENT.

  11. jbrittain says:

    I posted the other day what happened to the love for the lead actor in “A Better Life” on the BYOB blog and no one commented on it, so I just thought everyone ignorned me or thought I was stupid. Glad to see he got a SAG award nomination and I hope this keeps him in the running for Best Actor.

  12. JKill says:

    I am mostly just glad that Nick Nolte was nominated in Best Supporting Actor for WARRIOR.

  13. Paul D/Stella says:

    I’m guessing not too many have seen A Better Life jbrittain.

  14. leahnz says:

    daniella: don’t let him intimidate you with his ridiculous nonsense — root for whomever you like, go to the mat for whoever you want, as often as you want. it’s your blog as much as his

    (yay bridesmaids)

  15. LexG says:

    “root for whomever you like, go to the mat for whoever you want…”

    Exactly. Like Shailene Woodley.

  16. Glamourboy says:

    Lex constantly confuses good performances with fuckability. But mostly, Daniella, he just trolls for reactions here. He’s one of those people who are thrilled just to see their names written anywhere…even down here in a movie blog forum.

  17. sanj says:

    LexG – did you give up on K-Stew or Evan Rachel Wood ?

    hard to tell who’s a member of what acting group – how many international actors part of this sag ?

  18. Anghus says:

    Interesting.

    Its cool seeing Chris ODowd from the IT Crowd up for a SAG award. Go Roy.

    Its also interesting seeing Matthew Lillard nominated for an acting award.

    Sure, both are for ensemble work, but not names id expect to see on end of year acting awards.

    And I noticed Adrien Brody listed in the Midnight in Paris ensemble but not the guy who played Hemmingway. Wasnt Brody in the movie for two minutes?

  19. LexG says:

    Sanj, not at all, not ever. Thanks for the reminder: Evan Rachel Wood was snubbed, big time. WAY better than Octavia Spencer, for one. Kristen wasn’t really nominatable in anything this year, though.

    Janet McTeer, I haven’t seen NOBBS yet, but she kicked total ass in the little-seen “Cat Run.”

    If SAG is so America-centric, they still went for Bechir, Bejo, McTeer and Dujardin.

  20. yancyskancy says:

    Anghus: I asked the same thing about Corey Stoll in Ray Pride’s nomination announcement thread:

    “I don’t get why some of the films and shows in the ensemble categories seem to list everyone (including twin kids who barely have speaking roles) while others leave out major contributors (e.g., why isn’t Corey Stoll listed among the MIDNIGHT IN PARIS ensemble, when his role is probably larger than Adrien Brody’s, which IS listed, and much larger than Carla Bruni’s glorified cameo?).”

    Perhaps the studio or prod. co. determines who makes the cut? At any rate, it’s rather ridiculous that Bruni is included from MIP but not Stoll, Lea Seydoux, Kurt Fuller, Mimi Kennedy, Tom Hiddleston and Alison Pill, all of whom have roles equal to or larger than Bruni’s.

  21. sanj says:

    LexG – McTeer was so awesome in Cat Run… she kicked a lot of ass but they also made her human.. i want DP to see this movie and give a review.

    when you end up acting – do you automatically get into these dozen acting groups – do they give you a card or something .. seems nice cause then these millionaire actors always end up getting free stuff from companies ..

  22. Don R. Lewis says:

    Evan rachel Wood was absolutely snubbed for her incredible MILDRED PIERCE performance. Then again, I knew that would happen when I saw the show. As mentioned in another thread- people like Kate Winslet are automatic and it forces out other, well deserving actors.

  23. yancyskancy says:

    Happily surprised by Patrick J. Adams’ nod in the TV category for SUITS, one of my favorite shows this year. But no one from JUSTIFIED?

  24. sanj says:

    i hated mildred pierce but the acting was okay.

    Kate Winslet can do good acting in tv movies and real
    movies … she could have probably been in the help or
    another big movie ..every 2 years she up for a movie award… and yet no dp/30 ….

  25. MarkVH says:

    People need to quit it with the fucking Drive award talk. It’s a COMPLETELY mediocre movie with a couple of cool songs on the soundtrack. Cannot even believe it’s in the conversation.

  26. J says:

    I know this isn’t the place for this, really, and I know that her casting was obvious awards-bait, but Jessica Lange on AHS has made me happier than almost anyone else in my life or on film, this year. It’s a joy to watch her vamp.

  27. Martin Pal says:

    I was wondering about that Corey Stoll omission from Midnight in PAris as well.

  28. Hallick says:

    “Its cool seeing Chris ODowd from the IT Crowd up for a SAG award. Go Roy.”

    His character was the sane, centering presence in “Bridesmaids”, and his scenes with Wiig were almost another movie unto itself (that I usually enjoyed more).

  29. That’s YUL BRYNNER (spelling)!

  30. Joe Leydon says:

    Can’t thinking that, back in the day, LexG would have salivated over this one.

    http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118047500?refCatId=13

  31. Question... says:

    DP, do you want a DP/30 with Demián Bichir?

    I’ll get him for you.

  32. David Poland says:

    Do you have him in your basement or something, Question?

  33. Don R. Lewis says:

    MarkVH-
    Although I liked DRIVE alot more than you did, you bring up an interesting point either inadvertently or on purpose. I have favorite movies of 2011 and then I have ones that when I’m doing my year end “best of” list, ones that I think deserve award consideration. While I’ll likely include DRIVE in either instance, I doubt I’d include other faves from the year like ATTACK THE BLOCK, COLD WEATHER (which is on The Movie Channel this month and should be seen) or RED STATE.

    Not that anyone truly cares what I think, I just think it’s fun. But also- I still believe the awards lists when compiled do guide voters into deciding what to nominate and have win. If I really love a film that might be on the cusp, I might be more inclined to give it a higher slot to help the cause.

  34. anghus says:

    Hallick,

    i love Chris ODowd. IT Crowd is my favorite thing ever. In my next life i want to come back as Matt Berry.

  35. Hallick says:

    O’Dowd and Berry both have all-time-best comedy moments in the funeral episode of the second season of The IT Crowd. And Matt Berry pulled off the most difficult trick in television by joining a show that was perfect without a new regular and making himself indispensable in less than a minute on the scene.

  36. funny says:

    Not quite. But let me know.

  37. Danella Isaacs says:

    Jesus Lex, how dumb do you think we are? Meryl Streep, Tilda Swinton, and Viola Davis aren’t the post-40, female equivalents of Burt Young. They’re the equivalents, looks wise, of the middle aged Paul Newman, George Clooney, Sidney Poiter. Trouble with our society is that men over 40 are seen as more-distinguished looking, and women over 40–make that 32–are seen as “tired old bags.” Plus, if Burt Young gave a better performance than Ryan Gosling, he should be nominated over Ryan Gosling.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon