MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Gotta Love National Society of Film Critics

Giving out awards for 2011 in… wait for it… 2012!!!

And then, the choices. You can argue any of them or all of them if you like. But Melancholia for Best Picture and Terrence Malick for Best Director are not ” by the book.” Pitt, Dunst, Brooks, and Chastain are not just cookie cutter choices to Win. Yes, they haven’t gone far off the reservation, though wouldn’t it have been nice to see one of the other major critics groups embrace Melancholia back when they might have made a difference.

Be Sociable, Share!

4 Responses to “Gotta Love National Society of Film Critics”

  1. Danella Isaacs says:

    The NSCF has always been THE class act during awards season: Blow Up, Persona, Nashville, Ran, The Unbearable Lightness of Being, Drugstore Cowboy, Unforgiven (well, the Oscars got that right, too, actually), Pulp Fiction, Out of Sight, Mulholland Drive… All worth putting in the time capsule. A much better list than: The Sting, Gandhi, Amadeus, Forrest Gump, etc.

  2. leahnz says:

    the NSFC always have one thing in the ‘you done good’ column:
    1992, best actor – river phoenix (my own private idaho)

    legend

    (awww again with the poor gandhi! i don’t get it)

  3. John says:

    Dont knock AMADEUS. That is some greatness there.

  4. Danella Isaacs says:

    I’m not meaning to start a fight here, but I do think that the films on the NSFC list are more likely to wind up the subject of a “BFI Film Classics” book, released in a Criterion Collection edition, or found on a syllabus in a film history class. The latter list… Well, those films will always be watched and enjoyed on Turner Movie Classics. I just don’t think they’re the films that move the art form of cinema forward, really move people profoundly, or will be studied fifty years after appearing on the screen. I did stack the deck to make a point, admittedly. The Oscars did do right, in my estimation, by Midnight Cowboy, The Godfather I and II, Unforgiven, No Country for Old Men, and others back in the classical era.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon