MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

20 Weeks Of Summer: Wrapping Up

We’re near the end of Summer 2012… at least in the United States. The tricky part of analyzing how things have gone this summer is that so many big films have big markets still coming up on their release schedules. I count 10 films of the 36 on my seasonal chart as “Incomplete.” Four because of international (TDKR, Amazing Spiderman, Brave, Savages) and six because they are either too new in the marketplace or not here yet (The Campaign, Bourne 4, Hope Springs, Timothy Green, Sparkle, and Expendables 2). There are other films that have a lot of room to grow internationally, but have their pictures fairly well started, such as Moonrise Kingdom, Magic Mike, The Watch, Rock of Ages, and others.

Here’s what I do know. I was low on The Avengers by around 50%. I was too bullish on Prometheus and Battleship, both of which did over $300 million, but not anywhere near the $700m range. I thought Total Recall was going to be a breakout this month… until I saw it. Audiences were not as swept away by Rome, as they were with Paris. Another Adam Sandler flop. And Moonrise Kingdom has been stronger than I saw coming.

I was bigger on Ted than almost anyone… but not big enough, about 20% bigger than my early guess, but heading towards over $300m worldwide. Magic Mike did my worldwide guestimate in the US alone. Snow White & The Huntsman managed near $400 million worldwide, over $100m more than I expected.

I had a good beat on Spider-Man, Men in Black 3, Ice Age 4, Dark Shadows, The Dictator, Tyler Perry, Abe Lincoln, and Exotic Marigold. TDKR, now over $850m worldwide, may get to $1b, but not to my guess of $1.2b.

Only two of the six “Meedtobe Blockbusters” really came up short. But family Product remains the surest bet in Hollywood.

The place where there was the most disappointment was in The Middle. I had nine films in that category (that have opened more than a week ago) and only the two real underdogs smashes – Ted & Magic Mike – are really successful. The Dictator did fine, though it wasn’t explosive. (But did about the same as Bruno domestically and a little better overseas.) One thing about this group… all nine were “originals,” which makes one wonder whether “Hollywood” has forgotten how to sell a new idea (with, obviously, two exceptions).

Also not delivering big was my “2nd Tier Blockbusters” group, with only Snow White delivering more than $100m worldwide so far (and Bourne about to).

Analyzing this can be a Rorschach test. What does the author thing of the business. Me? I think the obsessive focus on the most expensive, highest profile movies have made studio marketing and distribution less sharp with less clearly defined product. WB is the exception this summer, missing badly only with Chernobyl Diaries. The Campaign and Dark Shadows may be a little disappointing, but both opened fairly well. And Magic Mike & Ted are really the two great surprises of the summer, driven, at first, by great marketing… both, by the way, R-rated and required to hint more than show.

Anyway, Disney had the biggest numbers and a tiny output. Paramount had the thinnest schedule, with just two films. Sony’s flops put a damper on their two $600m+ movies. WB did okay. U dud a lot to make up for Battleship with one of the summer’s biggest successes in Ted and nice numbers elsewhere. And Fox barely scraped by with Ice Age covering a myriad of sins, including The Watch, which will compete with That’s My Boy as the ugliest shoulda-been-commercial story of the summer.

I can’t bring myself to say that a studio that releases two franchise-y films in a summer and threw away one little fish from DreamWorks (which deserved better) is The Winner. But if you need to pick one… and you can’t get past Battleship… I guess that’s the pick. But for a studio that has taken a lot of heat this summer, Universal deserves recognition for selling – if not budgeting – their movies this summer.

Is there a loser? An even harder call. I don’t think so. The Weinsteins smashed their Piranha franchise into the rocks. But they were barely in the game this summer. Maybe Tobey Emmerich at the shell game that is New Line (Rock of Ages).

You tell me…

Be Sociable, Share!

16 Responses to “20 Weeks Of Summer: Wrapping Up”

  1. You’re right, Dave. Venezuela is a small market but, as an example, “Brave” just opened last week. And we still haven’t seen “Prometheus”, “Dark Shadows”, “Rock of Ages”, “Ted”, “Snow White and the Huntstam”. If that’s the case with the whole latin american markets, it’s clear that the story is not over yet.

  2. Krillian says:

    Charlize Theron starred in two movies this summer that made juuuust enough to justify sequels should the studios want them.

  3. cadavra says:

    “All none were original.” That doesn’t make sense. Maybe you meant “All nine were original…”?

  4. Drew McWeeny says:

    Ahhh… never mind. The chart layout made it look like you’d put in box-office numbers for “GI Joe: Retaliation.”

  5. David Poland says:

    Thanks, CAD… corrected.

    And yeah, Drew, didn’t want to just erase the movies without grosses or that were moved out of summer… so the bolding.

  6. etguild2 says:

    I would put TED incomplete. It has half the international market to go, and has been a phenom so far overseas.

    Agreed, Disney is the winner by default.

    Universal had a fine summer, but no better than WB. They released one fewer film than WB but likely spent at least $50 million more on the production side. SWATH and BATTLESHIP cost nearly as much as TDKR and DARK SHADOWS. BOURNE cost nearly as much as MAGIC MIKE, CHERNOBYL, THE CAMPAIGN and ROCK OF AGES combined. As you say in an earlier post, is 400 million enough to make a 200 million cost worth it? SWATH cost about 170, and made a bit under 400.

    I agree that BOURNE and TED still have upside internationally, but so does TDKR, and overall Universal has grossed about $150 million less worldwide than WB while probably spending roughly the same with marketing thrown in.

  7. SamLowry says:

    SWatH was considered a slight disappointment by the studio (believe it or not), which was the primary reason given for dumping KStew, who would’ve made $10M up front for appearing in the sequel.

    Even before L’Affaire, KStew was considered too polarizing–folks either love her or hate her–and the studio more or less admitted they made a mistake by counting on the legions of Twihards alone to support the film.

  8. Drew McWeeny says:

    Looking at the way “Ice Age” and “Ted” are performing overseas, maybe that’s the secret. Make sure your movie has at least one character that can be dubbed by a local celebrity to help with the local PR.

  9. LexG says:

    K-STEW is the NUMBER ONE AND ONLY REAL REASON SWATH was a MEGA HIT, she is one of the biggest stars in the world, and THE highest paid current actress.

    Everyone EVERYONE loves her. She is like Monroe in her heyday, only hot and sexy.

  10. etguild2 says:

    Lex, you better go see ON THE ROAD and BREAKING DAWN 2 at least 10 times each, because I don’t think she’s going to appear on-screen in 2013.

  11. LexG says:

    KRISTEN 4 EVER.

    She is the new Angelina Jolie. She’ll be starring in movies for the next 15 years, GUARANTEED. She is the biggest, sexiest, awesomest, most extreme and INTENSE movie starlet since Jolie.

    She is PURE, RAW CHARISMA…. she is hypnotic. Best actress of all time.

  12. BoulderKid says:

    DP you had a lot of nice calls like “Dark Shadows” and the “Ted” breakout, but “Prometheus” as a 100-150m type film domestically could be seen from a mile away. I know “Alien and “Aliens” were really big hits when you think about the actual attendance, but anything connected to the series since “Alien 3” has ended up with Prometheus like numbers when you adjust for inflation/3D. Alien3, Resurrection, and the first AvP all did business very similar to Prometheus.

  13. storymark says:

    Funny. Lex was starting to cool on K-Stew…. untill he found out she’s open to banging middle-aged guys.

    Keep the dream alive, Lex.

  14. SamLowry says:

    …middle-aged guys who could further her career.

    Don’t think that applies to anyone here…unless Don’s lurking in the shadows.

  15. cadavra says:

    Lex is already primed for 2014…when K-Stew competes on “Dancing With The Stars.”

  16. cadavra says:

    …and gets voted off the first week.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon