MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Wrapping Toronto

People keep asking me if I saw anything game-changing in Toronto.

And I have to say, “No.”

I saw some very good movies. Some of the better stuff I had already seen before the festival.

There were ten films at TIFF that I saw in Cannes. My favorites are Amour, The Hunt, No, and Rust & Bone. Strong, strong pieces that will have a presence in the US.

Harvey Weinstein is out front on The Sapphires, a classic audience film and quite enjoyable. Matteo Garrone’s Reality was, I think, one of the underrated films at Cannes. People were anticipating something more like his first international phenom, Gomorrah and got something quite different. Add to that, Europe’s Big Brother shows have a different place int he culture than ours in the US. I am also a fan of Ulrich Seidl’s demanding Paradise: Love, a movie about middle-aged women in search of something they are missing. A terrific conversation starter if nothing else for some. I am not a fan of Beyond The Hills, Laurence Always, or the pleasant but not so exciting The We & The I.

I saw two other TIFF titles I quite liked in Edinburgh, Scotland; Berberian Sound Studio and Pusher (UK version).

Also, outstanding titles from Sundance were The Sessions (formerly The Surrogate), and West of Memphis.

There are a dozen films that I am really upset about not seeing: The Act of Killing, Argo, The Attack, Cloud Atlas, Dangerous Liasons, The Iceman, Liar’s Autobiography: The Untrue Story Of Monty Python’s Graham Chapman, London – The Modern Babylon, The Pervert’s Guide to Ideology, The Place Beyond The Pines, Roman Polanski: Odd Man Out. To The Wonder.

Here, in alphabetical order, are my Top 13 of the 29 films I saw during (or just before) the festival itself…

Anna Karenina – I am not, generally, a Joe Wright fan. I think he’s gotten some nice performances from actors in the past, but has lost me on efforts at big style. Here, it’s big style from start to finish and i bought into it. Not everyone will. But I think there are enough people who will be pleased that it could well find a Best Picture slot at year’s end.

End of Watch – David Ayer’s best work feels a lot like Michael Mann’s work in downtown LA… but with better digital cameras. Strong performances, if a little familiar. But an audience pleaser… for people who don’t mind some blood and dirt and plenty of colorful language.

The Gatekeepers – Important, shocking, and fascinating. Dror Moreh gets the last 30 years of Shin Bet (Israel’s Secret Service) leaders to go on record and talk about the history of Israel and the Palestinians. Inspired by The Fog of War and a worthy follow-up.

Ginger & Rosa – One of those movies that a lot of people seem to hate. They’re wrong. It’s Potter’s most accessible film, a coming-of-age drama set in 60s London. The hjype has been around Elle Fanning, who is great in the film, but her other title-sharing half, Alice Englert, holds her own with style and the supporting cast is truly great, with the most surprising turns coming from Christina Hendricks and a stripped-down Annette Bening. Personally, I would love to see the movie about Bening’s character and her relationship with Oliver Platt and Tim Spall.

Looper – Rian Johnson’s best so far. He makes the complex simple and the simple a pleasure to watch. Of course, Joseph Gordon Levitt and Bruce Willis are not genetic matches… but as a director once told me, “Give me my fucking premise!” This is a wild idea that seems to make sense almost all the time. Solid, enjoyable movie movie.

The Master – I’ve written about this a lot. And there will surely be more. A somewhat inaccessible masterwork.

Mea Maxima Culpa – Alex Gibney is one of the great documentarians of this era. This time, he takes on the Roman Catholic Church, all the way up to The Pope. If Amy Berg’s Deliver Us From Evil and Kirby Dick’s Twist of Faith showed us the experience of this worldwide tragedy on a personal level of the victim and one hands-on victimizer, Gibney goes big picture, really nailing the institution that not only allowed this behavior, but to some degree, protected the abusers with full awareness.

On The Road – I didn’t see the Cannes cut, but I see this version – the release version – as a very youth-friendly, smart, passionate piece of history that is as modern as any rebellious teen/20something. It was expressed to me afterwards that this cut moves much faster than the previous one… and that matched my experience. The experience of being young is what drives the film, not a book or true life. Of course, the work of the actors is heavily influence by real life. Strong turns by the leading cast and a parade of great cameos, especially from Viggo and Amy Adams. And after all these people are talking about Steve Buscemi being perceived differently because of Boardwalk Empire, what until you see him in this…

The Perks of Being A Wallflower – A really good, smart coming-of-age movie. It’s all so familiar, yet all so fresh. Ezra Miller remains The Next Big Thing (who may not want it). Emma Watson continues to come of age before our eyes. I don’t quite get the boy-band stuff around Logan Lerman, but he’s a very solid center in this one. A movie you should see.

Seven Psychopaths – Martin McDonagh has expanded from two psychopaths to seven. Fun! It’s a pastry loaded to the edges with nuts. But a lot of fun. I might have tightened the film up a little bit, if I had my druthers. Leave them wanting more, I say. But there are a lot of weird angles and edges and surprising ideas that you’ll never see coming that make this film a really good time at the theater.

Silver Linings Playbook – David O. Russell returns to Flirting With Disaster territory and brings the stunning Jennifer Lawrence, the career-expanding Bradley Cooper, and the actually-acting Robert DeNiro along for the ride. This is going to be the non-rom-com rom-com of the year. Big audience movie. I give Lawrence a ton of credit on sheer on-screen presence that you never wonder for more than a second about the 15-year age difference. Weird, smart screenplay. I don’t know that it’s really a BP winner… but people are going to go in droves and have a great time.

Stories We Tell – Sarah Polley, one of the most private actresses in North America (directors are often equally press-shy), exposes her family’s romantic history/shenanigans/lies and bends the form known as documentary as well. A fascinating story well told.

What Maisie Knew – Another underdog movie that I really liked. Julianne Moore as the singer-songwriter-narcisist, Steve Coogan as her narcissist/estranged husband and Alexander Skarsgard and Joanna Vanderham as the adults dragged into and out of their wake. (Who is Vanderham? You’ll find out. She’s a keeper.) Of course, Maisie (Onata Aprile) is at the center, a six-year-old with a preternatural calm and something going on behind the eyes. Siegel & McGehee are two of my favorite filmmakers. They just seem to be able to find something in their films more without overselling or trying too hard. They had me interested in these people – any one of which on their own might be seen as a stock character – from start to finish.

And just for completion’s sake, here are the other titles I saw, 18 in all, with a lean positive or negative.

UP
Antiviral
The Bay
Byzantium
Great Expectations
Hotel Transylvania
The Impossible
A Royal Affair
Something In the Air
Sons of the Clouds
Storm Surfers 3D

NOT SO UP
Disconnect
Dredd 3D
Frances Ha
Hyde Park on The Hudson
A Late Quartet
Much Ado About Nothing
The Paperboy
Passion

Be Sociable, Share!

5 Responses to “Wrapping Toronto”

  1. Peter says:

    Saw many of the same movies you did. Surprise that you are not a fan of Francis Ha. I thought Gerwig carries it like a champ.

    My favorite is probably Stories We Tell, not sure how Roadside is going to sell it because it’s such an unconventional movie about the family of a Canadian Director/Actress. I don’t expect this getting a nomination for best doc because of this.

    Can’t wait to see Looper.

  2. Tuck Pendelton says:

    I’m dying to heard Poland’s Cloud Atlas review. He’s a huge fan of the Wachowski’s and I’m curious if he continued to like their work.

  3. sanj says:

    DP – how much extra time do you have with people before and after the interviews ….does everybody leave exactly at 30 minutes ..did anybody come 10 minutes early and just talk without cameras filming ? since actors do a lot of interviews in this festival do they actually remember you vs the 100 other movie people with cameras….

    some of these actors put on a great performance for dp/30’s cause there’s actually a great chance they don’t come back for 1 full year …pressure is on them.

    also now you have these mini reviews are you expecting to get quotes on movie posters ..

    so far the tiff 2012 interviews aren’t as much fun as the sundance 2012 interviews.

    also did any tv station anywhere try to get exclusive access to the dp/30’s before you put them up on youtube this year ? the tiff previews got a lot of views mostly
    cause of K-Stew and Jen ..and isn’t that what tv wants ? big name actors who talk about movies.

  4. Stephen Holt says:

    David! Those are my two top TIFF films, too! “Anna Karenina” and “End of Watch”! I thought “Anna” was a ravishing experience cinematically and despite, or because of the imposed theatricality of the stage setting, I think this is a film the Academy is going to embrace, whole-heartedly.

    It had that OLD Hollywood glamour to the max, and you know the Academy loves that. And a tortured love story and heroine who is not the easy-to-like-type. And Keira Knightley! Magnificent! In this weak best Actress field I totally see her getting in and maybe winning!

    And Jake Gyllenhaal and Michael Pena! They should be part of the Oscar conversation, too! Great, nomination-worthy career performances from both them!

  5. Frances says:

    Logan Lerman looks like a young Paul Rudd. And they are both Jewish. Too bad Rudd is not playing Lerman’s father in this film.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon