MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Friday Estimates by KladyNormal 4

Paranormal Activity 4 is looking at opening to $28m – $32m. Friday-vs-Friday is 44% off the last film, but it’s still a lot of money.

Great holds for Argo and Hotel Transylvania. For Ben Affleck, this means a stronger hold after a weaker launch than his The Town, with Argo still about $7m behind his last film at the end of this weekend. The 80m domestic area seems to be where this one is headed. For Hotel T, Sony Animation is looking at crowning its new “best ever” domestic grosser by the end of next weekend.

Alex Cross is a drag for Tyler Perry’s crossover aspirations. It will be his worst career opening on camera. Perhaps they should have called it Tyler Perry’s Alex Cross, leaving out the “i” or “a” and going to his traditional possessive titling. This is not complicated. If Tyler Perry wants to cross over, he needs to do small roles in real movies with real directors, not just try to move his box office power in “urban” cinema to broader audiences. With all due respect, there is a reason why KFC has an old white guy in the bucket. Crossing over means building another brand in Perry’s case. This also means risking, in a real way, the brand he has already established so brilliantly. This isn’t a racial issue. This is branding. It’s not like Denzel was branded as a rapper before he broke through. From the very beginning – St Elsewhere & Carbon Copy – he was branded as a crossover guy. Deal with it, TP.

Solid start for The Sessions, on 4 screens, doing about $25k per. It’s not a home run. There is work to do. And as always, exclusive opening windows do not offer a clear read of where many of these smaller films are headed domestically. But good start.

Be Sociable, Share!

15 Responses to “Friday Estimates by KladyNormal 4”

  1. Roger Bixby says:

    Wow, that’s a great hold for Argo. Looks like it’s heading towards $100 million. Impressive.

  2. chris says:

    I don’t think Summit did Perry any favors with its marketing. The poster — at least the one I saw — completely obscured his face and made the white guy, who is not a movie star for any demographic, the dominant image in the poster. TV ads also diminished Perry’s role. Shouldn’t the sell be, “You’ll like him, too,” not “Don’t worry — he’s barely in it”? (Because the odd thing is that Perry is good in the movie.)

  3. “Alex Cross” would have been a huge hit as a 10 p.m. drama on CBS (which they still COULD do)… as a movie, not so much.

  4. LYT says:

    Tyler Perry should look to the Adam Sandler model if he wants to be taken seriously as an actor. Get P.T. Anderson to direct him in a movie about a mental patient who really thinks he is an old woman. Tell me you wouldn’t go see that.

  5. etguild2 says:

    Nice to see so many good movies doing well. LOOPER and PITCH PERFECT will finish at around $65 mil and $55 mil respectively. ARGO could break $100. PERKS, which deserved better, will break $10 million without ever playing in 1,000 theatres….

  6. movieman says:

    As someone who loathed the original “Paranormal Activity,” I’m surprised at how much I’ve tolerated–and in some cases, actually enjoyed–the sequels.
    “Part 4” is in many respects the best of the bunch.
    I loved the verisimilitude of the suburban home that’s the new film’s principal setting. And the teenagers (who actually look and act like real teens: what a concept!) are flat-out terrific.
    Unlike the usual “Para” actors (e.g., Katie Featherston) who only seem to work in “Para” sequels, I can easily imagine these two having robust H’wood careers.
    Speaking of teen actors, I just returned from a promo for “Fun Size” and–ouch! Maybe if it hadn’t had a Nickelodeon Films imprimatur attached, and I had known that it was less of a kid’s movie than a (fairly inept) homage to ’80s/’90s teen comedies (think “Don’t Tell Mom the Babysitter’s Dead”), I would have been more tolerant.
    But virtually nothing about this movie works. It’s smutty, mean-spirited and spectacularly unpleasant despite a run time well under 90 minutes. And I actually thought the premise sounded “cute,” and hoped that it might be a fun, sweet-natured Nickelodeon Halloween comedy.
    Wow; was I ever mistaken.
    Unlike the “Para 4” kids, virtually none of the teen actors here (including the exceedingly mature 19-year-old femme lead who could pass for 28) look remotely like actual teenagers (her crush looks more like a dissolute 30-something rocker than a HS student). And, speaking of verisimilitude–or a lack thereof–setting a Halloween movie in Cleveland (?) in which all of the trees are in full summertime bloom, and there’s even an open swimming pool during a night-time party scene, is simply wrong.
    I wonder what will lay the bigger egg next weekend: this or “Chasing Mavericks.”

  7. anghus says:

    found footage is a shit genre. there have been some enjoyable experiments when people have played around with the formula, but the basic concept is so redundant and bereft of originality that i think im only capable of ‘marginal enjoyment’.

  8. scooterzz says:

    “found footage is a shit genre”

    doesn’t sound like you’re likely to change your mind but ‘v/h/s’ was a pretty refreshing take….

  9. anghus says:

    i heard good things about V/H/S (havent seen it yet). Dont know if my mind will change because theres so many of these films being made right now. In the low budget world where i live, there are nearly hundreds of requests for any found footage film because theyre cheap and easy. The pipeline is choked with crap content.

    I still think of them as novelty films. I dont think theres been one that has defined the genre yet as anything other than formulaic.

  10. Eric says:

    Blair Witch defined the genre, right? But that predates this glut by so far that it’s hard to put that in the same category.

  11. DiscoNap says:

    It’s completely unconscionable that the Alex Cross reboot isn’t a vehicle for Jamie Foxx, he’s fucking perfect for it and could use the boost. Plenty of “good” Patterson properties still to adapt (worst writer ever but cinematic). Maybe they’ll still fix this.

  12. LtotheG says:

    PARANORMAL 4 is *AWESOME.*

    Already seen it twice, might go two more times tomorrow and every day this week. This one has at least one element that is HUGELY appealing to me, though III was MUCH scarier, and this one’s just episodic and doesn’t build to too much.

  13. Rob says:

    I thought V/H/S was one of the worst movies I’ve seen this year. White bros either exploiting women or being victimized by them. And how does a recorded Skype session end up on VHS anyway?

  14. PcChongor says:

    For a rather fresh take on the whole “found footage” genre, check out “Snow On Da Block.” No ghosts or ghoulies, but still manages to feel like a mashup of “The Blair Witch Project” and “The Wire.”

  15. Kushal says:

    Awesome cameraman ganga tho rambabu rockss

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon