The Hot Blog Archive for March, 2007

In Bermuda….

It took a while, but I finally made my escape from New York… though it was hardly a brutal experience being stuck there. Amongst other things, it allowed me to check out Phillip Seymour Hoffman and John Ortiz in a show at The Public.
I keep apologizing, but the truth is, I am in a definitive in mode, in terms of information, and not in so much of an out mode. There have been a number of things that have made me want to write lately… until I actually have to sit down and do the writing.
A little sleep and a little sun should help move things along….
The Last Week
la.jpg
austin.jpg
ny.jpg
bermuda.jpg

2 Comments »

Friday Box Office

Not too much to say. The 300 drop is not surprising. The only real surprise this weekend is the strong opening of Dead Silence, which theoretically is right up against the 300 audience.
Decent reviews for Premonition seem to indicate that Wild Hogs will still be able to advertise “#1 comedy In America” for a third weekend.
I am rather disgusted by the spin that Variety continues to put on the “300 vs The Critics” thing. But I am equally irritated by critics who are fighting the issue as well, giving it more life. Even the great and wise Joe Morgenstern wrote about it in the WSJ Weekend Journal. And the fact is that this stuff happens every year and though the number was and is massive, we are a long, long way from any indication that anything has changed because of this movie… as in, “Didn’t we have this discussion last July when Pirates 3 opened?”
It is, simply, idiotic to argue that saying that this film is like a videogame is wrong either in conceit or detail. Rarely has a film so accurately embodied that accusation, whether you think “it’s a videogame” is praise or an insult. It is equally foolhardy to argue that all CG-heavy movies are the same as videogames. It is equally idiotic to start the “critics are out of touch” schtick again… yes, they are out of touch… they are in the business critical analysis of films. Real audiences don’t have that responsibility. And we don’t know what real audiences think of 300 yet. Based on that opening, when it hits $300 million, I will start writing about how the film really has become a cultural event. Until then, it’s chasing Night At The Fucking Museum.
So where are the trend stories about America wanting more movies about museums?
fri031607.jpg

58 Comments »

Yeah…. I know…

Sorry I have been so far gone…
For kicks, if you want to guess at what I am going to rip into in the Sharon Waxman ShoWest article, you can prestage it now!
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/15/movies/15show.html
Or you can use this space as you see fit…

18 Comments »

Daily David – A New York State Of Michael Moore

I caught Michael Moore on the streets of Manhatten, literally and figuratively, on Tuesday night after being at SXSW for the premiere of Manufacturing Dissent. The “caught” part was that he was, with two of his producers, having his first (and last) cigarette. After years in editing rooms with editors and others catching a butt break, he decided to see what it was all about.
Was this really Mike’s first cigarette ever? He says so… and one hopes so. He was so amused about the idea of being caught by “the media” having his only cigarette that I can’t believe that it wasn’t 100% true. Yet, it seems so unusual. And I didn’t talk about it in the Daily David for that reason. I really don’t want to have a bunch of people e-mailing me to tell me that they saw MM smoking some other time. But the conversation is interesting and amusing either way, which is just sooooo Michael Moore.
And I already feel guilty for questioning his veracity, because he was so funny and sweet and generous about the whole exchange. Also sooooooo Michael Moore.
Anyway… it’s a long one, but hopefully it will add to the conversation.
QuickTime | YouTube | iKlipz

5 Comments »

Daily David @ SXSW – 2 Films

What Would Jesus Do & Manufacturing Dissent
revbilly2.jpg
QuickTime | YouTube | iKlipz
And – indieWIRE on both films

2 Comments »

The Daily David – Going To SXSW

031207.tiff
QuickTime | YouTube | iKlipz

7 Comments »

Land, Lots Of Land…

Just some room for y’all to talk about whatever on a travel day…

68 Comments »

300 Spoiler Thread

You asked for it…. you got it…
Personally, I don’t think the movie can be spoiled, as it has a brain no larger than a head of a pin…. all groiin all the time…. but I guess a third act is a third act… and box office is box office….

50 Comments »

Here In Austin…

It was a long morning’s journey into day as I landed in Auston for SXSW on the 7:45a fight. By the time I had landed in the town that always winks, 300 had set a record for a non-summer/non-X-Mas-Giving opening, Morgan Spurlock had grown a Moses-like beard, and a former Abu Gharib guard had landed in Austn with a new female companion that he met on MySpace. What a country!!!
Within a few hours, I would find out why the response to The Ten was so lukewarm at Sundance, how many familiar faces from other places could fill the Ironworks bbq joint behind the Austin Convention Center, and how many murderous sheep can fit in a whisky bar. Even more surprising, I felt myself being very ambivalent about Michael Moore.
Well…
I guess that’s not such a surprise.
More to come as the weekend progresses… it always takes a day or two to figure out how to pace myself at a festival and in this case, I will be heading to the airport almost exactly 48 hours after landing.

3 Comments »

Box Office Hell

bohell0310.jpg

33 Comments »

DeNiro By QT

At the request of Jimmy The Gent, here someplace to discuss the QT analysis of Robert DeNiro…
Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3
(Sorry about the color… it gets better as the piece progresses)

40 Comments »

Rental/DVD Purchase Note

In the midst of all the fighting about it, I’m not sure I emphasized that anyone likes Zodiac or thinks it comes up a little short should be renting/buying Bong Joon-ho’s Memories of Murder, which is now available via Palm Pictures.
The story is about Korea’s first serial killer and the long, frustrating, emotionally draining effort to catch him.
If you love Zodiac as an experiment in form, this film will not eclipse it. If you are interested in the story, this film kicks ass.

15 Comments »

The A. Klein Of Western Civilization

Andy Klein has always been a very good film critic. But in the last six month or so, he has been on fire. I think, ironically, the war in Iraq has been really, really good for him. He is an angry young man again and he is willing to put it out there, hard and strong, and as close to reckless as you can get without being reckless.
(Disclosure: I have agreed with him on many of the reviews I find so amusing. But I have also appreciated many of the reviews on which there is disagreement. He is just plain putting it out there.)
Andy’s work is not well archived at L.A. City Beat, but you can read through it at Rotten Tomatoes.
This week, it

30 Comments »

Desperately Seeking Slumpin'

I haven’t really had the urge to call EW’s Joshua Rich an idiot. He’s hardly a savant, but there are no sharp edges that slice dangerously close to any ugliness. Until today.
In a PopWatch piece called “Hollywood’s box-office year: Good news, but for whom?,” he continues to argue the false notion that “The business is still struggling.”
Of course, it does struggle. But not in a way that this guy is equipped to even consider. He opines further:
“We’re the ones who stand to pay

12 Comments »

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon