MCN Blogs
Ray Pride

By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

George Lucas on theatrical: You could chop that off in a second

The Reporter’s Paula Parisi has a Hotel Bel-Air breakfast with George Lucas, whose coffee is definitely strong. “There are definitely some dynamics that are changing the economics of the business. What do you think of Mark Cuban’s idea of releasing films simultaneously at home and in theaters?” I think it’ll happen— it’ll have to happen… because of piracy. It’s the only way you can stop piracy; there is no other way. You have to get a very, very aggressive enforcement program so that people do have consequences to stealing, but you also have to be able to offer it to them … for the same price they can get it on the street. It won’t be DVDs—DVDs aren’t going to be around too much longer. If you can get it at home for $2, then why would you go on the street and get a bad version? jackcopgeorge.jpgLucas believes PPV will replace DVD. It’s the way kids do it today. It’s how you do it on your iPod: They just download it. You pay 99 cents for music, and movies will be like two bucks. That will definitely change the economics of the business because (studios) are losing money now… If you look at the (theatrical) divisions, I don’t think they make any money. I don’t think they’ve made money for five or six years… For studios, the fact is that the theatrical film market is less than 10% of their business—it’s very, very small. I mean, you could chop that off in a second, and it wouldn’t even bother them—they’re just doing it as a promotional thing.

Be Sociable, Share!

One Response to “George Lucas on theatrical: You could chop that off in a second”

  1. Yeah, I read this. I asked some lucas folks about this, and they said that Lucas was not referring to PPV so much as DRM downloads, like when you get software online instead of getting a disc… Anyway, there is a brand new book that might be interesting to you. DROIDMAKER: George Lucas and the Digital Revolution. http://www.droidmaker.com It really explores Lucas’ organization and formation.

Movie City Indie

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon