The Hot Blog Archive for September, 2006

Long Road To Toronto Lunch

Here we go… no Ammo in TO

7 Comments »

I Was Writing…

… an elaborate explanation of why Dennis McDougal’s The Departed piece in Sunday’s NYT was such shite… but the computer ate my homework. Here is the short version…
Nicholson had two massive comedy hits in 2003.
Scorsese

49 Comments »

Friday Numbers From Mojo

I don’t think Len Klady has returned from Toronto yet, so I don’t think we’ll be seeing his box office report until tomorrow…
I don

70 Comments »

The Departed

I’m not going to say much about The Departed right now, exceot to say that Scorsese is trying a lot of new stuff, it is perhaps the funniest cop movie ever, and once he gets out of the too-long first act, this is Scorsese’s best work since Casino. In many ways, it is better than Casino, but really, I want to look again before writing much more.
DiCaprio makes his next step from The Aviator. Damon continues to ascend. Nicholson is terrifc, though not chewing as much scenery as you might expect, considering how broad Bill Monahan’s brilliant script is. And smaller roles by Wahlberg, Winstone, Sheen, and especially home run pinch hitter Alec Baldwin are something special to behold.
This might be a truly great movie. (A 15 mimnute trim of the first act would help.) And while, in “Old Scorsese” tradition, this is an unlikely Oscar Best Picture player, you never know. I would be chasing acting, writing, directing, and craft nods in a big way if I was WB.
ADDITION, Saturday – I probably should have written “funniest serious cop movie ever.” This movie gets deadly serious, but damn, it is funny.
I would not recommend seeing Infernal Affairs first. Spending the whole time comparing is not my idea of a good way to see any movie. Seeing it afterwards and putting together the pieces would be fun though.
I think Casino is not the strongest of Scorsese’s gangster movies, but it is part of that run for him and has some great, great work in it (some of his most memorable). This film isn’t like the early films at all. Scorsese has brought his bigger budget bag of tricks to this film. And it is not the slice of perfection that GoodFellas is… as beloved as that film is, I still consider it underrated. There is a mature assuredness in that film and Scorsese is pushing himself like a kid filmmaker here, which I love. But he has so much power talent behind him, all the flourishes are just that, delightful as most of them are. I don

70 Comments »

Times Of Desperation, L.A.

Some days, I just have to shake my head and wonder, do John Horn and Patrick Goldstein, two normally honorable men who have sincere concerns about the quality of the newspaper they work for, have the balls to speak to their bosses about a huge misstep like the new

13 Comments »

The Sheep Worm Turns

It took only 24 hours for all that heat around Black Sheep to evaporate into a puddle of sheep dip.
The Dependents seem to be pretty much in single line on this one… Shaun of the Dead was a category killer. Horror Comedy is not safe. To get the film to even $8 million, you need to spend on TV ads… which mean you need to get it to the high teens at least. And it is possible, as Shaun proved, to get good reviews and great geek buzz and not get to $14 million.
The distributors with money aren

16 Comments »

The Truth About Toronto & Oscar

The stark reality of Toronto

68 Comments »

Billy Joel Reviews Bobby

“We didn’t just hate Bobby
Left our ire burning
And our stomachs churning
We didn’t just hate Bobby
Oh we tried to fight it
But the film ignited”
The rest…

17 Comments »

Tuesday Shorts

Give The Monkeys What They Want

12 Comments »

TIFF Photorama 2

bowling2.jpgbowling3.jpg
bowling4.jpgbowling5.jpg
bowling6.jpg

8 Comments »

TIFF Photorama 1

intercont1.jpgintercont2.jpg
intercont3.jpgintercont5.jpg
intercont4.jpg

2 Comments »

Tuesday Morning TIFF Frustration

Some days you eat the snake. Some days the snake eats you.
If I were the publicist that pushed me to attend the Tuesday morning screening of Sarah Polley

22 Comments »

Baa Baa Big Sale

The new

12 Comments »

TIFF Monday Comin' Down…

Today and tomorrow burn the festival candle at both ends before things start slowing down considerably.
(Yesterday

16 Comments »

TIFF Saturday Shorts

Word from Chicago is that Roger Ebert has moved into the rehab stage of his recovery in Chicago. Roger

5 Comments »

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon