BYOB Archive for October, 2008

BYOB – Apolitical

Yeah… we’re almost there.
No… I’m not going to stop just because we’re close.
Yeah… by the end of next week, you will see the last political post in here for a long while.


BYOB 102908

It’s Wednesday… and Bond shows tonight… and AFI launches tomorrow night… and Che’ in The Chinese on Saturday…


BYOB – Hump Day


BYOB – New Week 102008


BYOB – Debate Nigh… Or Not



People needs some room to run…
(PS: There have been a few comments held up – all published now – including links to an interview with the guy who did the beach images in an earlier entry… so take a look and see if you missed anything.)


BYOB – Friday….



BYOB – 37 Days Until Bond, For Girls

Kim Voynar is already changing MCN…


BYOB – Apolitical, 38 Days Until Bond



BYOB – Apolitical

For those who really do come here exclusively for movie stuff… sorry… kinda…
The election is, I feel, much more important and the behavior being exhibited lately is so extreme that silence about it seems like acceptance (see: The Clintons)… I can’t live with that.
But here is some space for something else.
And there will be more movie stuff as we come to the end of the election cycle.
Meanwhile, there is lots of good stuff on the cover of MCN, including the closing part of The 48 Hrs Diaries, 4 looks at Paul Newman (1, 2, 3, 4), a look at German cinema, Wilmington reviews and more.
And in BYOB, any ideas you feel like throwing out there….


BYOB Friday

And check out Google’s first search page… which is set up to search only what it searched when it debuted, 10 years ago.


BYOB – It's Hump Day!

from the streets of los angeles


Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon